New Windows 11 build makes mandatory Microsoft Account sign-in even more mandatory

KingKrayola

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,408
Subscriptor
This is not entirely correct.

Windows 11 as a major version has a full 10 year lifecycle. In theory, it is usually a 13 year lifecycle for the major version with ESU or LTSC or LTSC IOT updates. These LTSC releases also usually align with support lifecycles of Windows Server LTSC releases (2016, 2019, 2022, 2025, etc).

If you run Home or Pro editions each feature release (21H2, 22H2, 23H2) is supported with updates for 2 years on each feature release. You will be offered a feature release through Microsoft update if the support period ends.

If you run Enterprise or Education, you receive 3 years of support/updates on each feature release. You will be offered a feature release through Microsoft update if the support period ends.

If you run Enterprise or Education LTSC, you receive 5 years of support/updates. Each version of LTSC is considered its own feature release and only bug fix and security patches are provided. After 5 years you will receive no monthly updates and no offers to update to another release. An in place upgrade from install media to the next version of LTSC is supported.

If you run Enterprise or Education LTSC IoT, you receive 10 years of support/updates. Each version of LTSC IoT is considered its own feature release and only bug fix and security patches are provided. After 10 years you will receive no monthly updates and no offers to update to another release. An in place upgrade from install media to the next version of LTSC IoT is supported.

LTSC and LTSC IoT do not include the “Microsoft Store” and “Inbox Apps”. The Microsoft Store can be installed with a PowerShell command.

I know this is a long and somewhat redundantly worded post but it seems like there’s a lot of confusion about Windows versions and the support life cycle.
Can you do Microsoft SME licensing next? Ars should hire you as a summariser.

Or maybe work as an 'AI'?
 
Upvote
11 (11 / 0)
Post content hidden for low score. Show…
This is a dumb move all around. Forcing people to do things they don't like even if you can remove it later is just plane dumb. This will piss people off and thus it will almost always be a bad idea.

I just hope they are not dumb enough to mess with the pro versions and do the same. If I can't setup for domain and get around this as a temp setup I will start to push customers elsewhere. Management via MDM is available for all sorts of system types now so Microsoft's hold on the management side has slipped quite a bit...it still has some lead. That said, options exist and they need to start paying attention.
There is no way they are requiring pro versions to use a personal microsoft account. Don't worry. We are far away from them requiring everyone to use autopilot as well on the pro version.

This is also a dev track, they try things here that often gets stepped back, so while I understand the hate some are giving it, its not a given that they are going to remove this forever.
 
Upvote
-6 (2 / -8)

ianstar

Ars Centurion
338
Subscriptor++
Fuck you, Microsoft. If you had something people wanted they wouldn't be working so hard to get around it. Fuck your shitty data scraping, burning the consumer at both ends money grabbing bullshit. I hope those product people have bad days. I'm so fucking sick of getting got at every opportunity and then clever assholes like these two fuckers thinking up new opportunities. I don't want OneDrive, I don't want an Office subscription, I don't want MSN. I want you to give me what I paid for and fuck the fuck off.
I could not have said it better myself. Just in case the Copilot data scraping bot didn’t get the full message I’ll say it again. Fuck you Microsoft.
 
Upvote
15 (16 / -1)

gigaplex

Ars Scholae Palatinae
1,162
It is sort of interesting how much flack they are getting with 11. I wonder if it is just that the attitude here has turned around, or if they actually have a real flop on their hands.

Usually every other windows is relatively less-garbage. Check back when 12 comes out I guess.
No, every version of Windows since 7 has gotten flack, even Windows 10, until the successor came out when magically the predecessor was wonderful again.
 
Upvote
15 (16 / -1)
To translate from Corporate to English, just invert the intent.

"We’re removing the bypassnro.cmd script from the build to reduce the security and user experience of Windows 11. This change ensures that all users exit setup with internet connectivity and a way for Microsoft to up-sell you more and get their grimy hands on more of your data"
I love "user experience", don't you?
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)
Sadly, I tried Linux. It worked great out of the box. Installation went fine. It found all of my hardware, no problem. Browsing, no problem. But my fear was realized. There's one piece of software written in .NET 6 that I need to use which requires the .NET 6 Desktop on Windows, and for the life of me I couldn't figure out how to get it to run on Linux with either Bottles or Lutris. There's no known alternative to the software. After a couple of days, I gave up and installed Windows.

It felt bad. :\
So in January I decided to do a 90 day Linux challenge. I picked Fedora. And like you there is a specific piece of software which I use regularly which is Windows only.

My solution is that I run windows in a VM for when I need it. Ironically when I was on windows I kept a Linux VM for the same reason.

But otherwise for most of what I do, Fedora has worked extremely well.
 
Upvote
15 (15 / 0)

SparkE

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
119
The mandatory sign-ins make no sense. Not everyone is using their computer for productivity tasks, nor are they even necessarily using it with a monitor attached. It’s frustrating that you can’t just assume Windows will boot to the desktop then run its startup items.
I was forced to buy a new PC because my old, yet very powerful, Win 7 PC didn’t have the security crutch chip that Win 11 requires and Steam requires Win 10 or later.
I Installed ONE and ONLY ONE piece of software, Steam. That is the entire purpose on Windows now; running games.

If Microsoft tries to force me to create an account somewhere down the line, I’ll post a link to the YouTube video of me crushing the PC with a giant hydraulic press while the monitor displays the “Create an MS Account” prompt.
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)

yronnen

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
100
I've steadfastly stuck to local accounts on all of my Windows devices, yet I have an Iphone, an Ipad, and two generations of MacBook Pros all linked with my Apple login. I'm not even sure if I was ever given the option to use the first of those (when the phone was an iPhone 4) without an AppleID.

Yet, this article annoys me because I've always avoided a Microsoft login on any of my machines (though I do, in fact - if it's still active - have a separate, not tied to a machine login, Microsoft account.)

I guess I'm a hypocrite.

Perhaps if the rotating ads on my PC start menu, and my inability to uninstall the XBox widget and other intrusions weren't so annoying and pervasive I'd feel bad about it.

Or perhap I'd reconsider, but I've not been getting embedded ads on my Apple devices, and I haven't run across any pre-installed software (GarageBand for instance) that I can't casually get rid of without it reappearing.
Apple is nagging me to use their Apple TV+, Arcade, News, Fitness+ and all of their services, the same way that MS is doing. Go to the settings app and you'll see "eligible trials with new device" or something like that tab, or the occasional badge on fitness, or ads for their gambling (ahem, sports) app on their TV app, and the list goes on.

But Apple is cool, so that's fine.
 
Upvote
-5 (14 / -19)

Carewolf

Ars Tribunus Angusticlavius
9,681
You do need an account, but if you aren't buying any paid software you don't necessarily need a credit card on it.
When I last did it, I was not given the option of not making seting payment method when downloading a free application. Maybe xcode doesnt count as a free application for this purpose? Shrug. Apple software has never been logical or consistent.
 
Upvote
-4 (0 / -4)
Apple is nagging me to use their Apple TV+, Arcade, News, Fitness+ and all of their services, the same way that MS is doing. Go to the settings app and you'll see "eligible trials with new device" or something like that tab, or the occasional badge on fitness, or ads for their gambling (ahem, sports) app on their TV app, and the list goes on.

But Apple is cool, so that's fine.
And let's not forget the Apple App Stores, full of targeted ads.
https://ads.apple.com/app-store/advanced

In reality, they are forcing their app store on both iOS and macOS.
Try avoiding Mac App Store, and well, be prepared to learn all intricacies of the xattr-command.

"Apple does not sell your personal data including as “sale” is defined in Nevada and California. Apple also does not “share” your personal data as that term is defined in California."
Except when we do, let's hope the customers aren't able to read the fine lines.

Wonder where Microsoft got the idea of collecting logins and user data, pushing app store and all that?
 
Upvote
-11 (7 / -18)

Dirgible

Smack-Fu Master, in training
2
Between MS and Apple, Apple ID uses your email as a user ID, not directly pinned to your actual email. If you use Mail for your email, it has to access the password through keychain. If you sign out of your account, you can’t use their cloud or buy software through Apps. You can still expect to use the system normally, with your local password. If you back up to their cloud, you need to encrypt with a typed key word that you keep locally if you want to back up personal info. It feels like it’s silo’d correctly. MS wants direct access all the time, and expects it to be left open. It wants to use BitLocker, and automatically upload a generated key to their cloud. It doesn’t feel silo’d correctly. For the most attacked platform (that isn’t a router) this feels like putting your eggs in one basket.
 
Upvote
9 (9 / 0)

sroylance

Ars Tribunus Militum
2,156
microsoft's support for their account system is piss poor. I can't have a Microsoft account that uses my email address, because it got associated to a work account from a job I had 20 years ago, and they refuse to give me any option to recover it.
They completely fucked up my Minecraft account when they switched Minecraft from the old mojang accounts to Microsoft account, it just doesn't work anymore.

so, yea, fuck them. I would like to log in to my operating system and have control over how security works on it, entirely separate from the internet or whatever enshittified service they're trying to get everyone to use now.

this might be thing that actually gets me to use linux on my next PC instead. I hear compatibility in steam is pretty good lately.
 
Upvote
9 (10 / -1)

Tomcat From Mars

Wise, Aged Ars Veteran
131
Subscriptor
I know that this will be unpopular, but if you despise Microsoft and you are still running Windows "just for games" after all the shit they are pulling with Windows 11 then you are part of the problem. It means your entertainment is more important than your principles and your objection is just performative outrage with a Steam overlay.

I ditched Windows for Debian back in the noughts and never looked back. I only buy games that have native Linux support. Yes, I said buy, I'm not advocating all games must be FOSS. It was slim pickings at first, but it is how I found my favorite game of all times, Dominions by Illwinter Games. But now adays you can configure Steam to only show you game with Linux support and my cup runith over.
 
Upvote
-6 (8 / -14)

TylerH

Ars Praefectus
3,882
Subscriptor
I will never use a Microsoft account to log into my PC. It's not that I have some particular belief in MS' nefarious intentions, I just don't like the way it frames the relationship. My PC is not just an extension of the internet. It's not just an extension of my Microsoft account (or any other account).

Microsoft wants this, as far as I can tell, because it's trying to build the idea of your Microsoft account as an identity that you take with you across PCs.

I'm not even saying I see no use for it, but the pieces of that particular puzzle that I want to use are all available without jumping through that particular hoop, and I'm simply not enamored of the idea that my PC account is the meaningful part of the "my PC" equation.
And they want the idea of OS as a Service. One that they can turn off at any point when you stop paying a monthly fee after they inevitably switch to a subscription model for Windows.
 
Upvote
6 (6 / 0)

Antheraea

Smack-Fu Master, in training
47
No sound, but the correct audio output device selectable but no "test" buttons visible? systemctl --user restart pulseaudio

it has been over a decade since I last used Ubuntu and it tickles me a lot that not only does this exact problem still persist in the most mainstream linux distribution, but the solution is exactly the same.

I guess sound isn't very important to the developers of the distro? personally, I need my music running, and I can't play games without sound. it speaks to the priorities of devs that this is kind of basic functionality is still an issue.


On one hand, I've been rooting for this to be the kick in the ass the Linux community needs to actually improve their distros so they actually work with everything. On the other hand, until that happens, going without Windows is going to be a huge pain. For instance, results vary on whether my Elgato capture card will work on Linux at all (and it doesn't officially have support by the company so good luck getting help if it doesn't), and all but one of the Linux music players I tried in Arch last year lack AIFF tagging support.

Like, yes, I can technically surf the internet and program in a text editor. Hell, the PHP Nonsense I write in my free time would objectively be easier under Linux. But the fine details are the ones that tend to suck the absolute most any time I've tried to switch, and I just cannot deal with that overhead burden right now.
 
Upvote
13 (14 / -1)

graylshaped

Ars Legatus Legionis
61,700
Subscriptor++
It is getting to the point where even my non-techie friends moan about Windows upsells but I don't see it being enough to push them to Linux whilst the experience is anything less than perfect.
I'm hard-pressed to see anything in this story or comment section where the current Windows experience fits that description.
 
Upvote
-2 (0 / -2)
The inconvenient truth strikes again and again the righteous Ars audience downvotes it to hell.

This is just sickening.
Your LTSC suggestions were upvoted while the other poster’s was downvoted, likely because the post contained incorrect information regarding the LTSC lifecycle. You don’t receive 5+5 on LTSC.
 
Upvote
10 (10 / 0)

Sasparilla

Ars Tribunus Militum
1,618
Subscriptor
OK, I'll bite: HOW do you get this unobtanium?? Never been truly answered
I believe this is associated with corporate licensing. For normal folks (myself included) its not something you can get a hold of.

That said, I have been piecing together a new machine to build and this article pushed me to get my Windows 11 USB while the build still allows an easy no MS ID for the initial admin account. It does seem a bit daft, this only affects folks who know a bit of what they're doing installing Windows 11...is directly pissing those folks off to force data mining of their rarely used machine admin account, is that really what MS execs want to do?
 
Upvote
4 (4 / 0)

vdiv

Ars Praetorian
488
Subscriptor
So as a good compliant customer I paid MS $199 to get a non-transferable "digital license" (no product key) for a Win11 Pro install. I used my live account and then after the install created a local admin account, logged in through that, and deleted the live one. The "Windows Experience" crap of course is still there.

Am I an enabler? Should I feel used and cheated? Don't answer that!
 
Upvote
3 (3 / 0)

RoninX

Ars Praefectus
3,089
Subscriptor
The more I hear about Win 11, the more I wish that Linux would reach parity with Windows in terms of the games that are supported.

Maybe Valve could make this happen. Taking a smaller cut of Linux sales than Windows sales might provide a good incentive for developers to make sure their games are fully compatible with Linux...
 
Upvote
-4 (1 / -5)

password123

Ars Scholae Palatinae
912
Fuck you, Microsoft. If you had something people wanted they wouldn't be working so hard to get around it. Fuck your shitty data scraping, burning the consumer at both ends money grabbing bullshit. I hope those product people have bad days. I'm so fucking sick of getting got at every opportunity and then clever assholes like these two fuckers thinking up new opportunities. I don't want OneDrive, I don't want an Office subscription, I don't want MSN. I want you to give me what I paid for and fuck the fuck off.
Nice rant, and excellent use of the word fuck.

But the bright side here, is that MS is now back to being Pure Evil, this is a warm and familiar place to be with MS just like the good ole days.
 
Upvote
6 (7 / -1)

David651

Smack-Fu Master, in training
63
It is all about "forcing behaviors" as BlackRock's infamous CEO, Lawrence Fink, says. Microsoft will certainly bend a knee to that corporate directive. You will have an online account, read your EULA! Yield to the dark lord, resistance is futile. There will be a universal surveillance state, corporations and government will collude. You will be micromanaged to the most granular level like it or not. You will own nothing and be happy. Enjoy your chocolate cricket N-acetylglucosamine shake! Paranoid you say? I read the GMO tea leaves, they even have WiFi and spike protein now LOL.
 
Upvote
0 (5 / -5)
Upvote
0 (4 / -4)
I believe this is associated with corporate licensing. For normal folks (myself included) its not something you can get a hold of.
LTSC is sold both as volume licenses and single OEM license.
Don't be confused by the moniker "Enterprise".
It has nothing to do with where you can buy it, it's about the ability to connect to Active Directory, BitLocker etc.
 
Upvote
3 (5 / -2)